Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It's the only one still known that is an alpha emitter below thorium; now turning out to be one of the most valuable daters for things like meteorites. The first one in the country was built in that building. Now researchers could accurately calculate the age of any object made of organic materials by observing how much of a certain form of carbon remained, and then calculating backwards to determine when the plant or animal that the material came from had died. Our statistical analysis shows that the carbon 14 dating was unreliable: the tested samples are obviously heterogeneous, [showing many different dates], and there is no guarantee that all these samples, taken from one end of the sheet, are representative of the whole fabric. Now, you don't add all the other elements, but you add families. It is not the product of an artist. Learn More! Earth Optimism Summit.


Reprinted by permission. Important news about the Shroud of Turin, believed by millions to be the authentic burial cloth of Jesus Christ, has been flagrantly under-reported. Nevertheless, the lack of mainstream media interest does not diminish landmark new research contesting the results of the controversial radiocarbon test that dated the Shroud between the years and The chief complaint is that the three small Shroud test samples were cut from the same outer edge on a piece of the cloth long thought to have been added later in the Middle Ages. This would have been part of a repair or reweave on a corner that had become worn and frayed due to frequent handling when the Shroud was held up for public exhibition. In fact, this theory was proven correct in by American chemist Raymond N. Thankfully now there is a new chapter in the dating debate. In March, after two years of tests and analysis, Casabianca and his team of scientists published their results in the scholarly journal Archaeometry. Here is an excerpt:. But for thirty years, researchers have asked the laboratories for raw data. These have always refused to provide them.

Post a Comment. Notes and thoughts on Carbon 14 dating by Seu Bobo It occurred to me recently that all radio carbon dating is demonstrably false since the technique involves the measuring of and the accounting for radioactive datjng from nuclear bomb detonations that we now know never happened. I built the first U. Geiger counter right there. The first one in the country was built in that building. And, of course, following on carbon dating hoax was the great Hoa District.

Glenn Seaborg came in, and grew up there and so on, far into the night. But it also has this quality, that once you find a breakthrough, you quit roaming, you start concentrating.

Nobody has to tell you that. The first element I tested proved to be radioactive. How lucky can you get? Not only was it radioactive, but it was a unique type. It was an alpha emitter, the element samarium. It's the only one still known that is an alpha emitter below thorium; now turning out to be one datinv the most valuable daters for things meteorites.

That's the first thing I put in my Geiger counter. It worked. I thought, ''My God, I'm going to have my thesis in 90 days. But you begin to be drawn into what obviously is a major breakthrough. Radiochemistry was a major breakthrough. Then Lawrence's cyclotron started working. I did the Geiger counter ingot my Bachelor's in " lawrence is the atom smasher- he isn't implicated personally in the radiocarbon dating scam, just his mythical machines are. I don't know if there's any point in listing them, but some of them are quite important.

So the search for natural radioactivity was a good thesis, and it taught me a lot, because I had to purify these things. See, you don't just take a bottle off the shelf and put it in your Geiger cxrbon, because it may have some junk in it. And it takes very little of certain radioactivity contaminations to totally foul you up. Roughly, what you have to do is add all the other elements and then separate them away, and take the residuum.

Now, you don't add all the other elements, but you add families. To carbon dating hoax the rare earths, is a good month of hard work on the part of a good chemist, I mean an expert so each one of these took a lot of that. Roughly speaking, you throw anything in the Geiger counter and you'll get some count.

The Geiger counter is very sensitive. But what it means remains to be cleared up by two things, the chemical purification, and to measure the characteristics of the radiation. But that's what radiochemistry is all about, is to identify the isotopes, and you know most of the isotopes that are in the isotope table were discovered by that gang at Berkeley. In fact, they're called the Seaborg Tables. Now, this howx cooperation among scientists that was something that was in general peculiar to the Depression and peculiar to Carbon dating hoax.

Were you working with individuals from other disciplines carbon dating hoax out of graduate school? Libby: Oh yes. I had the only Geiger counter. Now, what role did your Geiger counter daying Were you or Ruben using the Geiger counter in your attempts to isolate Carbon 14? Libby: Well, we kept improving the Geiger counter. The Geiger counter was now being developed world wide. We kept improving it and we were on the forefront.

Whenever anybody would publish a change or improvement go here the technique, we had it, and usually it was our publication.

Not often were we beaten out cagbon anything. So we developed a Geiger counter called the screen wall counter. One of the problems with Geiger counters is, they have a wall, and a lot of the radioactive isotopes have very soft radiations, like tritium is extremely soft. So we developed this instrument which had a screen, and wasn't absorptive.

This allowed us to make measurements of the very weakest radiation. So when Martin and Sam finally did find radiocarbon, they used my screen wall to do it. If they hadn't had it, they wouldn't have found it. But what Sam and I did, which in retrospect was probably stupid, was to assume that the half-life would be three months -so it seems "wild" bill cornered the walled geiger counter market. Professor alvarez claims to have been aboard the "great artiste" when they dropped the hiroshima gimmick.

Luis and son pretended that they figured why the dinosaurs went away. It was happe times when richard got carrbon work with luie. Richard also came up with nemesis theory all by himself. Posted by Chris at Tuesday, August 26, No comments :. Newer Post Older Post Home. Subscribe to: Post Comments Atom.

Follow by Email.